COVID-19 is changing the way men and women split the risk in the workplace

In 2018 — the last year for which we have full statistics — 1,027 Canadians died on the job. All but 30 of them were men.

But thanks to a pandemic that has made many female-dominated jobs and professions much more dangerous, the outdoors is suddenly the safer place to work.

Service-oriented trades that tend to employ a lot of women — such as health care, education and retail — also involve a lot of interaction with the public.

That means a heightened risk of exposure to the virus that causes COVID-19. That heightened risk may be showing up in the caseload statistics now.

Unequal threats

In every age demographic but one (60 to 69 years), the number of women being diagnosed with COVID-19 slightly exceeds the number of male victims.

The demographic with the largest number of COVID diagnoses in Canada is women aged 20-29 — 15,177 cases, or 51.3 per cent of the total. And although the disease is generally thought to be more severe in men, more than half of those under the age of 40 being hospitalized with COVID-19 in Canada are women.

But it’s still not clear — and it may never be — how many of those infections came from work.

No field of work is more exposed to the risk of infection than the health care sector, which is about 80 per cent female.

Women make up over half of all family doctors and general practitioners and 90 per cent of all nurses in Canada. Six out of every ten pharmacists, seven of ten psychologists and eight out of ten physiotherapists in Canada are women.

Not only is the health care sector dominated by women, it’s also the only field of work where women run a higher risk of workplace injury than their male colleagues, according to the federal government’s Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety.

Health care workers at risk

A study released this week by the Canadian Federation of Nurses’ Unions (CFNU) revealed that 13,000 workplace injury claims relating to COVID-19 exposure have been filed already by Canadian health care workers.

“Nationally, health care workers comprise almost 20 per cent of all COVID‐19 infections in Canada, about double the global health care worker infection rate,” says the report.

The report describes what it calls a series of over-confident and erroneous assumptions by senior medical staff and administrators that led to health care workers lower down the chain being left under-protected.

The irony is obvious — especially when you recall that Linda Silas, president of the CFNU, questioned early on the assumption being made by many health officials that COVID-19 spreads through droplets but not aerosolized particles.

“When we do not know, we have to go for the best precautions for workers,” she said in mid-February. It would be months later before all health care workers began to receive the personal protective equipment (PPE) they needed.

Who gets defined as a health worker?

Canada’s official count of health care workers who have died of the novel coronavirus stands at 12, although unions place the number at 16.

COVID fatality rates for health workers might be higher “if we had a better definition of who they are,” said Ivy Bourgeault, a research chair in Gender, Work and Health Human Resources at the University of Ottawa’s Telfer School of Management. 

“I think when you look at exposed workers in housekeeping, I think of them as health workers because they’re helping to keep those places clean and healthy,” she said. “But the data typically don’t capture people in sanitary and dietary roles.”

The pandemic also has hit other sectors that employ a lot of women, such as retail, restaurants and hospitality and education.

Ontario, which has seen a steep rise in new cases in recent weeks, has just imposed stricter measures in three regions that ban indoor dining at restaurants and bars and close gyms, movie theatres and casinos.

Health measures have improved at supermarkets and grocery stores since the early days of the pandemic, when many employers — following government advice at the time — told their employees not to wear masks at work.

Canada-specific data is lacking but the United Food and Commercial Workers Union, which represents 1.3 million workers in the U.S. and Canada, said that 82 of its members who worked in U.S. grocery stores and supermarkets died during the first 100 days of the pandemic, while more than 11,000 were sickened over that time.

But the union, which also represents workers in the food processing industry, reported even more deaths and infections among members who didn’t work in grocery stores or supermarkets.

It’s a reminder that COVID-19 has no gender preference — only vectors.

“Some of the deaths are in industries where males predominate,” said Bourgeault. “Meat-packing plants and migrant farm workers, for example. Those outbreaks disproportionately affect men rather than women.”

So on balance, said Bourgeault, “I don’t think we’re going to see a massive increase in deaths that would cause a shift in the gender-based trends that we see in work-related deaths.”

In fact, COVID typically hits men harder than it does women — which helps to explain why men outnumber women in the number of COVID fatalities in every decade of working life. In the 60 to 69 age demographic, for example, 427 men and 259 women had died of COVID in Canada as of Oct. 8.

It’s only in the over-80 age demographic that you start to see the number of women dying outstrip the number of male victims — 3,995 women and 2,723 men. (Most of those who have died of COVID-19 in Canada have been well past working age; fewer than 1,000 Canadians aged 20 to 70 have died.)

To approach the number of men who die on the job in even a normal year, all of COVID’s working-age victims of 2020 would have to be female and all of their infections would have to be acquired at work.

Bourgeault said she does expect COVID to change the relationship some female workers have with their employers.

Workers who take risks expect to be compensated for them. Many Canadian grocery and retail chains introduced small pay premiums (typically $2 per hour) in the early days of the pandemic.

‘We have a chance to fix this’

In June, the Loblaws, Walmart and Metro grocery chains halted those pay hikes. Jerry Dias, president of the Unifor union, condemned the move.

“The fact is, the pandemic did not make these workers essential and did not create the inequities in retail,” Dias said. “It simply exposed them.

“We have a chance to fix this. We can’t let this opportunity pass.”

Bourgeault said unions are now taking an interest in the plight of the underpaid workers (most of them female) facing a heightened workplace threat due to COVID-19 — workers those unions don’t always represent.

“I see that there has been a lot of solidarity amongst unions that don’t necessarily cover personal support workers or have them as members,” she said.

“Unions become much more relevant to workers when they feel they are not respected, kept safe, and remunerated appropriately. And all three of those things are happening now.”

She said she’s encouraged to see governments support pay increases for personal support workers that would raise the status of a traditionally female-led occupation.

“If this kind of work is ‘essential,’ then it should be much better remunerated.”